Housing Affordability Index Canada: Tracking the Cost of Homeownership Over Time
Updated
Housing affordability is the defining issue of Canadian real estate. What took 3–4 years of income to buy in the early 2000s now takes 7–8 years — and in Vancouver and Toronto, it’s 10–14 years. Here’s a comprehensive look at how we got here, where we stand, and what the data says about where we’re headed.
How housing affordability is measured
Key metrics
Metric
What It Measures
Source
“Affordable” Threshold
Price-to-income ratio
Years of gross income to buy average home
CREA/StatsCan
<5x
Mortgage carrying cost (% of income)
Monthly mortgage + taxes + utilities ÷ income
RBC
<32% (GDS)
Income required to qualify
Minimum income to pass stress test
National Bank
Varies by city
Ownership cost vs rent
Whether buying or renting is cheaper
Various
Rent-to-own ratio <1.0
Affordability index
Composite measure scored relative to history
RBC, National Bank
Below long-term average
The RBC Housing Affordability Index
The RBC Housing Affordability Index is Canada’s most widely cited affordability measure. It calculates the share of median pre-tax household income needed to cover ownership costs (mortgage at prevailing 5-year rate, property tax, and utilities) for the median-priced home.
RBC Index Level
Interpretation
30–35%
Affordable — most households can manage
35–45%
Moderately stretched
45–55%
Unaffordable — requires dual high incomes
55%+
Severely unaffordable — most households priced out
60%+
Crisis-level affordability
National affordability over time
RBC Affordability Index (national, all housing types)
Year
RBC Index (% of income)
5-Year Fixed Rate
Avg Home Price
Interpretation
2000
32%
7.4%
$163,000
Affordable
2005
35%
5.5%
$249,000
Moderately affordable
2008
42%
5.8%
$305,000
Stretched
2010
39%
4.6%
$339,000
Moderately stretched (low rates helped)
2015
42%
2.7%
$443,000
Stretched despite low rates
2019
48%
3.1%
$503,000
Unaffordable
2021 Q1
44%
2.0%
$688,000
Temporarily improved by ultra-low rates
2022 Q2
62%
5.3%
$713,000
Crisis — worst ever recorded
2023 Q4
55%
5.8%
$657,000
Severe — slightly better with price drop
2024 Q4
52%
4.8%
$670,000
Improving slowly
2025 Q4
49%
4.3%
$685,000
Continued improvement
2026 (est.)
47–48%
4.0%
$700,000
Still unaffordable but trending better
Source: RBC Economics. Index = ownership costs as % of median household income.
What the trend shows
Affordability has been in a long-term decline since the early 2000s. The brief improvement in 2020–2021 was an illusion — low rates made payments cheaper, but prices surged in response, and when rates normalized, affordability collapsed to the worst level ever recorded in 2022. The current slow improvement is driven by rate cuts and income growth, not price declines.
Affordability by city
Major city comparison (2025–2026 estimates)
City
Median Home Price
Median Household Income
Price-to-Income
Mortgage Carrying Cost (% of income)
Income Required to Qualify
Vancouver
$1,180,000
$85,000
13.9x
78%
$195,000
Toronto
$1,080,000
$90,000
12.0x
69%
$180,000
Hamilton
$780,000
$82,000
9.5x
56%
$133,000
Victoria
$820,000
$80,000
10.3x
60%
$140,000
Ottawa
$620,000
$95,000
6.5x
42%
$108,000
Montreal
$550,000
$72,000
7.6x
47%
$98,000
Calgary
$560,000
$95,000
5.9x
38%
$100,000
Halifax
$480,000
$72,000
6.7x
43%
$87,000
Winnipeg
$370,000
$75,000
4.9x
33%
$69,000
Edmonton
$400,000
$92,000
4.3x
30%
$74,000
Saskatoon
$370,000
$80,000
4.6x
31%
$69,000
Quebec City
$350,000
$70,000
5.0x
33%
$66,000
Assumptions: 20% down payment, 5-year fixed at 4.3%, 25-year amortization, stress test at 6.3%. Carrying cost includes mortgage, property tax (1%), and $300/month utilities.
City affordability tiers
Tier
Cities
Price-to-Income
Carrying Cost
Crisis
Vancouver, Toronto
12–14x
65–80%
Severely unaffordable
Victoria, Hamilton
9–11x
55–60%
Unaffordable
Ottawa, Montreal, Halifax
6.5–8x
42–48%
Stretched
Calgary
5–6x
35–40%
Affordable
Edmonton, Saskatoon, Winnipeg, Quebec City
4–5x
30–35%
What income do you need?
Income required to buy a median-priced home (by city)
City
Median Home Price
Down Payment (20%)
Mortgage Amount
Monthly Payment (4.3%, 25yr)
Stress Test Income Required
Vancouver
$1,180,000
$236,000
$944,000
$5,100
$195,000
Toronto
$1,080,000
$216,000
$864,000
$4,667
$180,000
Hamilton
$780,000
$156,000
$624,000
$3,371
$133,000
Ottawa
$620,000
$124,000
$496,000
$2,679
$108,000
Montreal
$550,000
$110,000
$440,000
$2,377
$98,000
Calgary
$560,000
$112,000
$448,000
$2,420
$100,000
Edmonton
$400,000
$80,000
$320,000
$1,729
$74,000
Winnipeg
$370,000
$74,000
$296,000
$1,599
$69,000
Most Canadian households earn $72,000–$95,000. In Vancouver and Toronto, you need roughly double the median income to buy the median home.
The income gap
City
Income Required
Median Income
Gap
Vancouver
$195,000
$85,000
$110,000 short
Toronto
$180,000
$90,000
$90,000 short
Hamilton
$133,000
$82,000
$51,000 short
Ottawa
$108,000
$95,000
$13,000 short
Montreal
$98,000
$72,000
$26,000 short
Calgary
$100,000
$95,000
$5,000 short
Edmonton
$74,000
$92,000
Affordable — $18,000 surplus
Winnipeg
$69,000
$75,000
Affordable — $6,000 surplus
Only Edmonton and Winnipeg allow a median-income household to comfortably qualify for a median-priced home. In Vancouver, you’d need to earn more than double the local median.
The first-time buyer perspective
First-time buyers face additional challenges beyond high prices:
First-time buyer affordability (2026 estimates)
Factor
20 Years Ago
Today
Change
Avg entry-level home (national)
$140,000
$500,000
+257%
Min down payment required
$7,000 (5%)
$25,000 (5%)
+257%
Years to save down payment (10% savings rate)
1.5 years
5+ years
+233%
Monthly mortgage payment
$900
$2,700
+200%
Qualifying income needed
$38,000
$95,000
+150%
Household income
$46,000
$92,000
+100%
The core problem: Incomes have doubled in 20 years. Home prices have tripled. The gap compounds over time.
Provincial affordability comparison
Province
Avg Home Price
Median Income
Price-to-Income
Affordability Ranking
British Columbia
$960,000
$82,000
11.7x
10th (worst)
Ontario
$850,000
$86,000
9.9x
9th
Nova Scotia
$400,000
$65,000
6.2x
8th
PEI
$380,000
$60,000
6.3x
7th
Quebec
$450,000
$68,000
6.6x
6th
New Brunswick
$310,000
$60,000
5.2x
5th
Manitoba
$340,000
$70,000
4.9x
4th
Newfoundland
$280,000
$63,000
4.4x
3rd
Alberta
$450,000
$90,000
5.0x
2nd
Saskatchewan
$330,000
$78,000
4.2x
1st (best)
What will improve affordability
Scenario analysis
Scenario
How It Helps
Magnitude
Likelihood
Interest rates fall to 3%
Lower carrying costs
Improves index by 5–8 points
Moderate
Prices drop 15%
Lower purchase price
Improves index by 8–10 points
Low-moderate
Incomes grow 5%/year for 5 years
Higher purchasing power
Improves index by 6–8 points
Moderate
30-year amortization available to all
Lower monthly payments
Improves index by 4–6 points
High (already expanding)
Massive supply increase
More homes → lower prices
Improves index by 5–15 points
Low (takes 5+ years)
All of the above combined
Could bring index back to 35–40%
Low
The math of a return to “normal”
For affordability to return to the long-term historical average (~38% RBC index), one of the following would need to happen:
Path
Required Change
Timeline
Prices decline
−30% from current levels
Requires severe recession
Incomes rise
+60% increase needed
Would take 10–12 years at 4%/year growth
Rates fall
Would need sub-2% rates with no price response
Unlikely — low rates cause prices to rise
Combined: flat prices + income growth + lower rates
5–7 years of stagnation + 3–4% income growth + rates at 3.5%
Most likely path, but slow
The bottom line
Housing affordability in Canada is at historically poor levels — carrying costs take roughly 48% of median income nationally
Vancouver and Toronto are in crisis — requiring double the local median income to buy a median home
The prairie provinces are still affordable — Edmonton, Saskatoon, and Winnipeg remain accessible to median-income households
Rate cuts are helping but won’t solve the problem alone — lower rates reduce payments but tend to push prices higher
A return to historical affordability norms will take years — even under optimistic scenarios
First-time buyers face a compounding gap — prices have grown 2.5x faster than incomes over 20 years