If you are choosing where emerging markets fit in the bigger picture, start with our ETFs and index funds hub.
Best Emerging Market ETFs on the TSX
| ETF |
Ticker |
MER |
Yield |
Holdings |
Top Country |
Distribution |
| iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets |
XEC |
0.28% |
~2.5% |
1,400+ |
China ~28% |
Semi-annual |
| Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap |
VEE |
0.24% |
~3.0% |
5,600+ |
China ~30% |
Quarterly |
| BMO MSCI Emerging Markets |
ZEM |
0.29% |
~2.5% |
800+ |
China ~28% |
Annual |
| TD Emerging Markets |
TPE.B |
0.48% |
~2.0% |
Varies |
China ~25% |
Annual |
Best US-Listed Emerging Market ETFs (Accessible from Canada)
| ETF |
Ticker |
MER |
Holdings |
AUM |
Top Country |
| Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets |
VWO |
0.08% |
5,800+ |
$80B+ |
China ~30% |
| iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets |
IEMG |
0.09% |
2,800+ |
$75B+ |
China ~28% |
| iShares MSCI Emerging Markets |
EEM |
0.68% |
1,200+ |
$18B+ |
China ~28% |
| Schwab Emerging Markets |
SCHE |
0.11% |
1,800+ |
$8B+ |
China ~30% |
EM ex-China Options
| ETF |
Ticker |
MER |
Holdings |
Largest Country |
Notes |
| iShares MSCI EM ex China |
EMXC |
0.25% |
600+ |
India ~25% |
Removes China entirely |
| Freedom 100 EM |
FRDM |
0.49% |
100 |
Taiwan ~25% |
Weights by freedom/governance metrics |
Country-Specific ETFs
| ETF |
Ticker |
MER |
Country |
AUM |
| iShares MSCI India |
INDA |
0.64% |
India |
$8B+ |
| iShares MSCI Brazil |
EWZ |
0.58% |
Brazil |
$4B+ |
| iShares MSCI South Korea |
EWY |
0.58% |
South Korea |
$4B+ |
| iShares MSCI Taiwan |
EWT |
0.58% |
Taiwan |
$6B+ |
| iShares MSCI Mexico |
EWW |
0.58% |
Mexico |
$2B+ |
| KraneShares CSI China Internet |
KWEB |
0.68% |
China (internet) |
$5B+ |
Country Breakdown of Major EM ETFs
| Country |
XEC Weight |
VEE Weight |
GDP Rank (EM) |
Key Companies |
| China |
~28% |
~30% |
#1 |
Tencent, Alibaba, CATL, BYD |
| India |
~20% |
~22% |
#2 |
Reliance, Infosys, HDFC Bank |
| Taiwan |
~17% |
~16% |
#3 |
TSMC, MediaTek, Hon Hai |
| South Korea |
~12% |
~0% (FTSE classifies as developed) |
#4 |
Samsung, SK Hynix, LG |
| Brazil |
~5% |
~6% |
#5 |
Petrobras, Vale, Itaú |
| Saudi Arabia |
~4% |
~4% |
#6 |
Saudi Aramco |
| South Africa |
~3% |
~4% |
#7 |
Naspers |
| Mexico |
~2% |
~2% |
#8 |
América Móvil, Walmex |
| Indonesia |
~2% |
~2% |
#9 |
Bank Central Asia |
| Thailand |
~2% |
~2% |
#10 |
PTT, CP All |
Note: FTSE (used by Vanguard/VEE) classifies South Korea as developed; MSCI (used by iShares/XEC) classifies it as emerging.
The China Exposure Debate
If you want developed-market diversification without this concentration risk, see best international ETFs in Canada.
| Viewpoint |
Argument |
Solution |
| Include China |
18% of world GDP — can’t ignore it; diversification benefit; growth potential |
Standard EM ETFs (XEC, VEE) |
| Exclude China |
Regulatory risk, geopolitical tension, government intervention in markets |
EM ex-China (EMXC) |
| Reduce China |
Balance exposure without eliminating it entirely |
Smaller EM allocation (5%) |
| Separate allocation |
Control China weight independently |
5% EM ex-China + 2% China-specific ETF |
| Period |
Emerging Markets (MSCI EM) |
Developed Markets (MSCI World) |
S&P 500 |
| 2020–2024 (annualized) |
~3% |
~10% |
~12% |
| 2010–2024 (annualized) |
~4% |
~10% |
~12% |
| 2000–2024 (annualized) |
~7% |
~6% |
~7% |
| 2000–2010 (annualized) |
~16% |
~1% |
~1% |
EM outperformed massively in 2000s, underperformed in 2010s-2020s. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Why Include Emerging Markets
| Reason |
Detail |
| 55% of global GDP |
Emerging markets produce over half of world economic output |
| Younger demographics |
Working-age populations growing (vs aging in developed markets) |
| Rising middle class |
Consumer spending growing rapidly |
| Diversification |
Low correlation with North American markets (some cycles) |
| Valuations |
EM stocks trade at significant discount to US stocks (P/E ~12 vs ~22) |
| Growth potential |
Higher GDP growth rates (5–7% vs 1–3% for developed) |
Risks of Emerging Market ETFs
| Risk |
Examples |
| Political instability |
Coups, sanctions, nationalization (Brazil, Turkey, Russia) |
| Currency volatility |
EM currencies can lose 20–40% suddenly vs USD/CAD |
| Regulatory risk |
China tech crackdown destroyed billions in shareholder value |
| Governance |
Weaker corporate governance, minority shareholder protections |
| Liquidity risk |
Some EM stocks have thin trading volumes |
| Capital controls |
Governments can restrict capital outflows |
| Geopolitical risk |
Taiwan-China tensions, US-China trade war |
| Higher volatility |
EM drawdowns regularly exceed 30–40% |
| Missing out on US |
Heavy EM allocation means less US tech/growth exposure |
EM Currency Impact on Returns
| Scenario |
Impact on CAD-Based Investor |
| EM currencies strengthen vs CAD |
Positive — boosts returns |
| EM currencies weaken vs CAD |
Negative — drags returns even if local stocks rise |
| USD strengthens vs EM currencies |
Negative for EM stocks (capital outflows) |
| USD weakens vs EM currencies |
Positive for EM stocks (capital inflows) |
Currency impact can add or subtract 5–15% to annual returns.
Portfolio Allocation
This decision is easiest when you first set your broad stock/bond mix using asset allocation by age.
Recommended EM Allocation
| Approach |
EM Weight |
Implementation |
| Market-weight global |
~10% |
Already in XEQT/VEQT (~5-8%) |
| Moderate overweight |
10–15% |
Add XEC or VEE alongside core |
| Equal-weight by region |
20–25% |
Deliberate EM tilt |
| Underweight/avoid |
0–5% |
Via all-in-one only, no additional EM |
If you want those exposures bundled for simplicity, compare best all-in-one ETFs in Canada.
Sample Global Portfolio with EM Tilt
| Holding |
Allocation |
Region |
| VFV (S&P 500) |
35% |
US |
| XIC (Canada) |
25% |
Canada |
| XEF (EAFE) |
20% |
Europe/Japan/Australia |
| XEC (Emerging Markets) |
15% |
EM |
| ZAG (Bonds) |
5% |
Canada |
TSX-Listed vs US-Listed EM ETFs
| Factor |
TSX-Listed (XEC, VEE) |
US-Listed (VWO, IEMG) |
| MER |
0.24–0.29% |
0.08–0.11% |
| Currency |
Trades in CAD |
Trades in USD — need FX conversion |
| US withholding tax (RRSP) |
15% drag on US-layer dividends |
0% (Canadian treaty with US) |
| US withholding tax (TFSA) |
15% drag |
15% drag |
| Complexity |
Low — buy on TSX |
Moderate — need USD |
| Best for TFSA |
✅ Simpler |
Slightly better tax on direct EM dividends |
| Best for RRSP |
Good |
Better MER, no US withholding |
If you plan to buy the US-listed versions, use Norbert’s Gambit and review best account type for US stocks and ETFs in Canada.