Reality: The ~0.30% withholding tax drag is embedded in all Canadian-listed S&P 500 ETFs. Holding US-listed VOO in an RRSP saves this, but currency conversion costs often exceed savings.
Should You Use Norbert’s Gambit for VOO?
Portfolio Size
Currency Cost (VFV)
Gambit Savings
Worth It?
$25,000
$0
~$75
No
$50,000
$0
~$150
Maybe
$100,000+
$0
~$300/year
Yes
Norbert’s Gambit makes sense for large RRSP holdings switched to VOO.
If you have not used that conversion strategy before, follow Norbert’s Gambit.
Sample Portfolios Using S&P 500 ETFs
100% S&P 500 (Aggressive)
ETF
Allocation
VFV
100%
Simple but lacks diversification.
US + Canada + International
ETF
Allocation
Exposure
VFV
50%
US Large Cap
VCN
25%
Canada
VIU
25%
International
More diversified approach.
S&P 500 + Bonds (60/40)
ETF
Allocation
VFV
60%
VAB
40%
Balanced with fixed income.
When to Consider Hedged ETFs
Scenario
Hedge?
Long-term investing (10+ years)
No
Short-term (< 3 years)
Consider yes
Regular withdrawals in CAD
Consider yes
Expecting CAD to strengthen
Consider yes
Expecting CAD to weaken
No
Not sure about currency
No (default)
Alternatives to S&P 500
If You Want
Consider
Total US market
VUN (0.16% MER)
US + International
VXC (0.21% MER)
All-in-one
VEQT, XEQT
If you are deciding between this narrow US large-cap sleeve and a more diversified equity approach, compare best growth ETFs in Canada and best international ETFs in Canada.
| More diversification | XAW (0.22% MER) |
| US tech focus | QQC.F (Nasdaq 100) |
The Verdict
Category
Best ETF
Overall best
VFV or ZSP
Lowest MER
VFV/ZSP (tied at 0.09%)
Taxable account
HXS
Need CAD stability
VSP or XSP
Largest/most liquid
ZSP
Bottom line: VFV and ZSP are essentially identical. Pick one and contribute consistently.